• Citizens for Space Exploration
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • Radio/Podcast
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Search
Menu

Colorado Business Roundtable (COBRT)

4100 Jackson St
Denver, CO, 80216
303-394-6097

Your Custom Text Here

Colorado Business Roundtable (COBRT)

  • About
  • Partners
    • Citizens for Space Exploration
  • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
  • Media
    • Radio/Podcast
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Search

Ted Cruz Announces 2016 GOP Presidential Bid

March 23, 2015 Contributor

Conservative Texas senator Ted Cruz is first to announce a run.

"I'm running for President and hope to earn your support!" Ted Cruz announced Monday via Twitter. Janet Hook, of the Wall Street Journal writes about Ted Cruz's politics.

 

By Janet Hook

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, whose combative approach to politics has helped guide the Republican Party’s right wing, entered the 2016 presidential race on Monday, kicking off a primary-election debate about how aggressively conservative the GOP should be as it seeks to recapture the White House.

“I’m running for president,” Mr. Cruz said in a Twitter post, becoming the first major candidate of either party to enter the race and heightening his national visibility.

The announcement by Mr. Cruz marks the beginning of the primary election battle to define a Republican Party that is divided about the balance between ideology and pragmatism, and which is uncertain about who should lead it. His candidacy comes as recent polls indicate that none of the likely candidates has yet emerged as a bridge-building consensus choice among the party’s factions.

Mr. Cruz will be planting his flag on the far right flank of what is expected to become a crowded primary field spanning an ideological spectrum from centrists, such as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, to the libertarian Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and social conservatives like Mike Huckabee, a former governor of Arkansas.

Mr. Cruz stands for a brand of ideological conservatism that contrasts with former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who has said a successful presidential candidate must be willing to “lose the primary”—that is, risk angering the party’s most conservative followers—to succeed with the more centrist electorate in the general election.

By contrast, Mr. Cruz has sometimes angered congressional leaders by pushing for conservative goals, such as ending the Democratic-backed Affordable Care Act and President Barack Obama’s immigration policy, at the cost of provoking gridlock in Washington. He was widely blamed for helping to prompt the 2013 government shutdown, an effort to unwind the 2010 health law that many Republicans say wound up damaging the party’s image.

Mr. Cruz is scheduled to speak Monday at Liberty University, a Christian college in Lynchburg, Va., founded by the Rev. Jerry Falwell.

Mr. Cruz’s early presence in the field could pressure other potential candidates to move to the political right on fiscal policy, social issues and on the tactics for pursuing policy goals, particularly among contenders who are trying to establish themselves as the leading conservative alternative to Mr. Bush.

Sen. Ted Cruz announced his bid for the presidency on Twitter.
Sen. Ted Cruz announced his bid for the presidency on Twitter. Photo: Associated Press

“Cruz has the potential to take up quite a bit of space on the right in the conservative primary-within-the-primary,” said Kevin Madden, a veteran GOP campaign strategist. “The candidates looking to grab the mantle of being the antiestablishment choice for voters will certainly start to feel pressure to match Cruz step for step and not allow themselves to get outflanked to their right.’’

Mr. Cruz argues that the GOP repeatedly has lost the White House because it has rejected strict conservatives in favor of more centrist candidates.

“If we run another candidate in the mold of a Bob Dole or a John McCain or Mitt Romney, we will end up with the same result, which is millions of people will stay home on Election Day…If we run another candidate like that, Hillary Clinton will be the next president,” Mr. Cruz said in a 2014 CNBC interview.

By jumping in first for the most wide-open GOP nomination fight in a generation, Mr. Cruz is hoping to claim a measure of visibility. Other potential candidates are preparing to formally declare their bids in the coming weeks.

Well known public figures like Messrs. Bush and Christie seem to be in less of a rush to launch races and inaugurate a more intense stage of campaigning and scrutiny.

Still in his first term—he was elected in 2012—Mr. Cruz has used his place in the Senate to define himself as one of the most ardent conservatives and as more aggressive than party leaders in fighting for policy goals. One example came in 2013, when he delivered a 21-hour speech on the Senate floor to dramatize his opposition to funding for the health-care law.

He highlighted that contrast in a recent video he called “Truth,” which implied that other Republican candidates offer more talk than action.

“Obamacare: When have you stood up and fought against it?” Mr. Cruz said in the video. “President Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional executive amnesty: When have you stood up and fought against it?” he asked, referring to the president’s actions, without congressional approval, to shelter many illegal immigrants from deportation.

Mr. Cruz’s supporters contend he is in a good position to appeal to voters across party lines who are disillusioned with the political system. “There is clearly a frustration in this country with the status quo, and people are looking for something new and something different,” said Saul Anuzis, former chairman of the Michigan Republican Party.

But Mr. Cruz’s Republican critics say he is too polarizing to be a strong general election candidate.

“He thinks he has a formula for energizing conservatives, but he doesn’t have the skill or inclination to reach out to other people,” said Pete Wehner, a Republican strategist who worked in the George W. Bush White House. “I don’t think he’s got much appeal beyond the core base of the Republican Party.”

A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll this month suggested that Mr. Cruz had work to do to boost himself among Republican primary voters. Some 40% said they could see themselves backing him for president, while 38% said they couldn’t.

Democrats already are criticizing Mr. Cruz as someone outside the mainstream on issues including climate change, which Mr. Cruz has said isn't supported by science.

“That man betokens such a level of ignorance and a direct falsification of the existing scientific data…[he] has rendered himself absolutely unfit to be running for office,” said California Gov. Jerry Brown, speaking Sunday on NBC.

Write to Janet Hook at [email protected]

In Blogs, Nation Tags candidate, candidates, congressional, conserative, conservatism, electorate, general election, GOP, Governor, leaders, primary, primary election, representational art, Republican, Ted Cruz
Comment

The Case for the Export-Import Bank

July 7, 2014 Jeff Wasden
Press Release for Immediate Publication:
Too often, politics hamper the ability of business to expand and put Americans to work. What used to be an important bipartisan reauthorization of the Export-Import bank has now fallen firmly in the cross-hairs of some members of the GOP. Charges of crony capitalism and big governmental overreach flow freely from opposition tongues. "Let the private sector fill that space in the market. Those big companies don't need the Ex-Im Bank, they can get capital on their own," scream critics. While I can appreciate the basis for their argument, their facts on this issue are off base and in some cases, just flat out wrong.While numerous Presidents have lauded the successes of the Ex-Im Bank, I want to quote two former U.S. Presidents for context:President Ronald Reagan, January 30, 1984: "In order for the United States to maintain its strong position in foreign markets, it is important that the Congress pass the Export-Import Bank bill and avoid attaching unnecessary encumbrances."

President George W. Bush, June 14, 2002: "I have today signed into law S. 1372, the Export-Import Bank Reauthorization Act of 2002. This legislation will ensure the continued effective operation of the Export-Import Bank, which helps advance U.S. trade policy, facilitate the sale of U.S. goods and services abroad, and create jobs here at home."

The Ex-Im Bank's primary mission is American jobs. By financing the export of American goods and services, the Ex-Im Bank has supported 1.2 million private-sector American jobs. 205,000 in 2013 alone. This April, the United States exported $193.3 billion of goods and services according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) of the U.S. Commerce Department. Exports of goods and services over the last year totaled $2.3 trillion, which is 45.1 percent above the level of exports in 2009, and have been growing at an annualized rate of 9.0 percent when compared to the 2009 level.

In fiscal year 2013, Ex-Im Bank approved more than $27 billion in total authorizations. For the year, the Ex-Im Bank approved 3,413 transactions for small-business. Of the total number of transactions approved just last year, 89 percent were for small business, the backbone of American Main Street economies. While critics tend to overlook this important fact, the disparity in the total number of transactions for big and small business make the argument for reauthorization even stronger.

For those that do not understand the composition of the Ex-Im Bank, it is an independent, self-sustaining agency that fills in the gaps in private export financing at no cost to American taxpayers. It is the official export credit agency of the U.S. The Bank provides a variety of financing mechanisms including working-capital guarantees, export-credit insurance, and financing to help foreign buyers purchase U.S. goods and services. In the past five years, the Bank has earned $2 billion more than the cost of its operations and after covering loan loss reserves. That is money that is put in the Treasury to help reduce the federal deficit.

The Ex-Im Bank does not compete against the private sector but acts as a complimentary player. While they work to fill in the gaps through loans, guarantees, and insurance programs, the private sector lenders are Ex-Im Bank partners. During the FY 2013, 98% of the Ex-Im Bank's transactions involved commercial banks.

How does Colorado benefit from the Ex-Im Bank? Since 2007, 93 Colorado exporters have use the Ex-Im. 68 of those exporters are small businesses. International trade (both exports and imports) supports 680,000 Colorado jobs. These jobs are related to both large and small companies from farms to factories to headquarters of Colorado's globally engaged firms. Colorado alone exports tens of billions of dollars in goods and services annually. Exports have been shipped to 210 countries with top countries like Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, China, and Mexico. Today, more than one in five jobs depend on international trade!

Rhetoric is tossed around. A few members of Congress have made "killing" the Ex-Im Bank one of their priorities, but I feel we must hold politicians to the same standard as they ask us to do as citizens- to look at the facts and make an informed decision. Money returned to the Treasury, supporting and growing U.S. jobs, helping manufacturing and other key industries remain viable in America and putting Americans to work. From companies big and small, from the rural farmlands to high rise corporate America, the Ex-Im Bank has been a vital and necessary tool for continued growth and prosperity. Why cut off one of the most efficient, low risk, successful programs that contributes to the "jobs, jobs, jobs" focus that is so important to both political parties?

Please let your member of Congress know that you support continued American prosperity, increased opportunities to promote and sell goods and services and a program that lets the world stage know that the U.S. is open for business. Your member of Congress can be found using this site:http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/ By contacting Congress and letting them know you support the Export-Import Bank reauthorization, you can send a strong message that we support Colorado businesses.

This is one program that business of all sizes and citizens from differing political affiliations should stand together with locked arms and tout the ongoing success and viability of a program that has carved into the debt while at the same time supporting working families all across this great nation. Let's not say we are open for business and then shut down one of the tools that helps grow our economy. I urge all members of Congress to look at the proposed changes and to make the right choice for American business and reauthorize the Export-Import Bank.

In Blogs, Featured Stories, Mexico, Politics Tags bipartisan, EXIM Bank, Export, GOP, import, Policy
Comment