• Citizens for Space Exploration
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • Radio/Podcast
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Search
Menu

Colorado Business Roundtable (COBRT)

4100 Jackson St
Denver, CO, 80216
303-394-6097

Your Custom Text Here

Colorado Business Roundtable (COBRT)

  • About
  • Partners
    • Citizens for Space Exploration
  • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
  • Media
    • Radio/Podcast
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Search

Turning Old TV Frequencies into Free Super-WiFi

November 25, 2014 Keenan Brugh

Old television frequencies are becoming increasingly available around the world as broadcasting continues switching from analog to digital transmission technologies. Governments are, for the most part, auctioning these spectrums off to mobile phone network operators. However, these frequency bands would be better utilized in creating publicly accessible, long-range WiFi networks --- according to a new study from Germany's Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). While this conclusion is contradictory to conventional thinking, it is certainly worth further consideration since one of the world's most prestigious research and educational institutions says it is

1.) technically achievable

&

2.) beneficial to economic growth.


Utilizing the lower frequency ranges would give this new “super WiFi” a much wider range than existing WiFi frequencies are capable of attaining.

“Implementation of our approach would have far-reaching consequences,” says Arnd Weber of the Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS) at KIT.

“Individuals, institutions and companies would be far less dependent on expensive mobile communications networks in conducting their digital communication. This would be of great economic benefit.”

As internet service providers and wireless network operators fight for ever-increasing monopoly power over American consumers, maybe a surprising alternative such as this will start spreading. Suddenly, embracing net neutrality and even Title II classification might not sound so crazy to corporate industry incumbents like Comcast and Verizon.

Since U.S. mobile data rates are already among the most expensive in the world, why should we expect that to change if we sell the rights to these additional frequencies? The free-to-air television frequencies are currently considered a public good --- perhaps we can adapt them into a more modern and more valuable public good: free basic internet access.

What if America's interstate highways all became privately owned toll roads? Would the benefit to the toll operators charging for road access outweigh the economic burden imposed on individual citizens and businesses? Probably not, a great number of people would argue. While obviously not a perfect analogy, the picture might help illustrate the infrastructure system that powers and supports the American way of life.

While there are clearly compelling social arguments about why free internet access is an important factor in creating equal opportunities for citizens - education, employment, freedom of speech, etc. - those points, unfortunately, may be hard to measure and justify to people predisposed to the status quo.

Instead, let's stick with rational economic theory to conclude for now. Most modern growth models all seem to agree that economies are primarily powered by productivity growth - innovation and the spreading of new ideas. Unnecessary scarcity of internet access would be a costly mistake in the long run.

It's not a simple subject, though the outcomes are important, so it is certainly worth exploring all available options.

In Featured Stories, Science & Technology, World Tags ISPs, net neutrality, title II
Comment

Is This the End of Unlimited Data Plans?

July 28, 2014 Keenan Brugh

Verizon to Throttle Unlimited Data Customers.  When smartphones first came out, mobile phone carriers were competing with each other to sign users up. Unlimited data plans were a way of enticing users to sign up with them as opposed to their rivals. Since then, data usage has gone up, users have become locked in, and now the companies see an opportunity to make more profit off of you. So far, Verizon has managed to squeeze the most money out of its customers.  They all, however, have been aggressively pushing users onto limited data plans that offer a certain amount of data per month (for a high price) and then charging extra fees if users go over. As a long-time Verizon customer with a grandfathered unlimited plan, I feel upset about Verizon's new announcement.  It appears to signal the death of the unlimited data plan I know and love.

"Starting in October 2014, Verizon Wireless will extend its network optimization policy to the data users who fall within the top 5 percent of data users on our network," the Verizon announcement said. "They may experience slower data speeds."

They call it "network optimization", but it's really just throttling anyone that uses more than 4.7 GB a month.  Verizon's FAQ claims this isn't "throttling" because it's not 100% all the time - though optimization applies for the full billing cycle after you connect to a cell tower that's experiencing "heavy demand".  What makes this network optimization policy especially unsavory is that it's not applied universally.  Customers on the expensive and limited plans won't be slowed down at all - though they still have to pay a high price for data even when connected to towers with low demand. As Ars Techinica reports, throttling eases congestion - but data caps apply even when there's no congestion.

Verizon has been leading the way, and the others are likely to follow. This unfortunately leaves customers with little choice but to just accept it.

Please let us know if you find any alternatives.

In Featured Stories, Information, Science & Technology Tags data, mobile, net neutrality
Comment

Tell the FCC to Keep the Internet Free

July 14, 2014 Keenan Brugh

Today is the last day to have your voice heard in the FCC's initial round of public comment on net neutrality.  Many internet experts believe Tom Wheeler's proposal threatens the truly open internet we all know and love. The proposal tries to change the rules of the internet. Historically, internet access has always been neutral. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) did not block sites or engage in “technical discrimination,” treating traffic from some sites or applications better than others. They did not offer “paid prioritization” — fast lanes for those willing to pay extra. Up until this year, the FCC guaranteed net neutrality, but the new proposal would change that. Though it forbids outright blocking, it still permits technical discrimination and paid prioritization. It also permits ISPs to negotiate exclusive deals, offering only certain companies access to the fast lane, while relegating all of their competition to the slow lane. Finally, it has loopholes permitting access fees and discrimination through interconnection and mobile access.

Please support efforts to maintain a truly open internet.  File a comment with the FCC and tell them to support reclassifying ISPs as Title II common carriers.

John Oliver presented this issue on his new show, Last Week Tonight, and encouraged viewers to "prevent cable company f@%kery" by commenting at http://www.fcc.gov/comments Over 647k comments have been submitted already.

In order to ensure accurate wording of an admittedly complex topic, this statement from Reddit was used as a reference resource.

In Featured Stories, Science & Technology Tags FCC, free internet, net neutrality
Comment

Google Publicly Shames Slow Internet Providers

June 1, 2014 Keenan Brugh

Lately, internet content leaders like Netflix and Youtube have been threatened by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) like Comcast and Verizon.  In an apparent response to the intense FCC lobbying by some ISPs, Netflix and Google have decided to increase transparency by publicly ranking internet providers by speed. Netflix has already created its ISP Speed Index and Youtube has now joined with its Google Video Quality Report.

In Blogs Tags bandwidth, internet freedom, net neutrality
Comment

Netflix Challenges Verizon's Demands

June 10, 2014 Keenan Brugh

The battle continues between content providers and large internet service providers (ISPs) Verizon sued the FCC to overturn long standing net neutrality protections.  Netflix was then forced to start paying Verizon for the "last-mile" to their mutual customers. Apparently the money wasn't enough, and the service has not yet improved for many customers. Netflix recently started alerting some customers about ISP traffic conditions as the reason for longer load times or lower quality playback. Verizon is threatening to sue Netflix if they don't stop. (Read the full letter here)

As Quartz reports, Netflix is refusing to comply with Verizon's cease and desist demands. Here’s the letter from Netflix's general counsel David Hyman responding to Verizon's Randy Milch:

In Blogs, Featured Stories, Politics, Science & Technology Tags net neutrality, netflix, verizon
Comment