• Citizens for Space Exploration
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • Radio/Podcast
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Search
Menu

Colorado Business Roundtable (COBRT)

4100 Jackson St
Denver, CO, 80216
303-394-6097

Your Custom Text Here

Colorado Business Roundtable (COBRT)

  • About
  • Partners
    • Citizens for Space Exploration
  • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
  • Media
    • Radio/Podcast
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Search

Letter Of Credit: Shipment Of One Cow (Partial Shipments Prohibited)

May 19, 2015 Roy Becker

As we have discussed in various other blogs, letters of credit contain precise requirements that the beneficiary must meet in order to receive payment. The letter of credit must also state the specific documents needed to meet the requirements. Then, other conditions may exist such as whether partial shipments are allowed or not. If allowed, the beneficiary may make a partial shipment, present documents and get paid for the value of the goods shipped. Later he may make another shipment, present documents and receive payment, etc.

One beneficiary enjoys telling the story of the letter of credit he received for the shipment of “one live cow.” The letter of credit contained the condition that partial shipments were not allowed.

He thought this condition rather humorous since a partial shipment would be, well, utterly impossible!

In Blogs, Business, Featured Stories Tags beneficiary, Letter of credit, partial shipment, Payment, Roy Becker, shipment
Comment

Does The Letter Of Credit Police The Transaction? Which Seems Better? New Or Reconditioned?

March 2, 2015 Roy Becker

Letter Of Credit, Confirming Bank, Issuing Bank, UCP

LETTER OF CREDIT WAS PAID BY THE BANK This insightful story, told by Jim Harrington, concerns a company that builds equipment for manufacturing cans used in the food and beverage industry. The manufacturer received a letter of credit to pay for a shipment of one machine. Since the documents complied with the terms of the letter of credit, the confirming bank in the Unites States made payment and sent the documents to the issuing bank in Brazil. The issuing bank in Brazil inspected the documents and also honored the payment.

BUYER CLAIMED IT WAS A USED MACHINE, NOT NEW

When the goods arrived in Brazil, the buyer discovered that the vintage machine, manufactured in the 1920s, did not meet the conditions of the contract, which indicated a new machine.

BANKS DEAL IN DOCUMENTS, NOT IN GOODS

When the buyer complained to the issuing bank in Brazil, the bank explained that they deal in documents, not in goods, and that the buyer had no claim against the bank because the documents complied with the terms of the Letter of Credit. As a courtesy, the issuing bank sent a message to the confirming bank, which in turn contacted the beneficiary to inform him of the mistake. Upon checking his records, the beneficiary discovered that through a computer error, a reconditioned machine left their warehouse instead of a new machine.

A GOOD DEAL FOR THE BUYER

The beneficiary contacted the buyer in Brazil with an offer to return the used machine in exchange for a new one, or alternatively, accept a credit of $100,000 and keep the old machine. Upon careful thought, the buyer determined that the more stringent manufacturing specs in the 1920s made the reconditioned machine of better quality than a new one, so he decided to keep the old one and accepted the $100,000 credit.

LETTER OF CREDIT RULES WERE FOLLOWED

The rules for processing letters of credit (UCP) clearly indicate that with a letter of credit, “Banks deal with documents and not with the goods, services or performance to which the documents may relate” (Article 5). Any disputes regarding the goods are handled directly between the buyer and seller, properly leaving the bank as an independent paymaster.

In Blogs, Business, Featured Stories, World Tags bank, beneficiary, brazil, conditions, confirming bank, goods, ICO Terms, International shipping, Letter of credit, manufacturing, shipment, UCP
Comment