• Citizens for Space Exploration
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • Radio/Podcast
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Search
Menu

Colorado Business Roundtable (COBRT)

4100 Jackson St
Denver, CO, 80216
303-394-6097

Your Custom Text Here

Colorado Business Roundtable (COBRT)

  • About
  • Partners
    • Citizens for Space Exploration
  • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
  • Media
    • Radio/Podcast
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Search

Oil Companies Look to Join Climate Debate

May 28, 2015 Guest Author

After years of resistance, oil executives are raising global-warming issue ahead of summit

By BILL SPINDLE and FRANCIS X. ROCCA, of the Wall Street Journal.

Oil companies are ratcheting up their involvement in the debate over climate change as governments, activists, churches and some big investors gear up for a global summit on the issue at the end of the year in Paris.

The stated goal of the summit is to keep manmade warming limited to two degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, but governments remain far apart on how to achieve it.

Meeting such a goal will require far-reaching changes in energy-consumption patterns and likely efforts to put a cost on carbon use, many experts say. Activists have long focused much of their effort on trying to rein in the use of resource companies’ bread and butter: carbon-emitting fossil fuels.

RELATED Interview -- Mining Interest on C&C

Pope Francis is planning to weigh in on the environment in an encyclical—a letter intended to develop and explain Catholic teaching—due within the next few weeks, which has made Rome one of the focal points in the global-warming debate. Exxon Mobil Corp.recently dispatched one of its senior lobbyists and a planning executive to Rome in an attempt to brief the Vatican on its outlook for energy markets.

For years, shareholder activists have urged resource companies to curb emissions. More recently, some big investors are taking global warming into consideration in their portfolio building. The Church of England and Norway’s sovereign-wealth fund, one of the world’s biggest institutional investors, have sold off shares in pure-play coal companies.

‘We have to stop being defensive.’

—Total CEO Patrick Pouyanné

At the same time, some of the resource companies’ own shareholders are pushing them to scale back their dependence on carbon-based fuels, worried about the future financial impact of heightened global-warming regulation. Oil, mining and coal companies also are anticipating rules to limit emissions that would make oil and natural gas more costly, potentially reducing demand for the fuels.

This has led to a change in behavior. Where in the past executives could be dismissive of the climate-change debate or leap to defend their companies, industry officials are now raising the issue themselves and proposing remedies such as the imposition of a carbon tax.

“We have to stop being defensive,” Total SA Chief Executive Patrick Pouyanné told a major industry conference in Houston last month. “In the end, it won’t be solved by diplomacy only, but by private players, economic players like us.”

Total, Saudi Aramco, Eni SpA, BG PLC, Royal Dutch Shell PLC and others have formed an industry group specifically to add their collective voice to the climate debate, and they are trying to bring other leading international oil-and-gas companies into the group.

“Business is engaged in a way I’ve never seen before,” said Rachel Kyte, head of the climate-change division of the World Bank.

Similarly, the mining industry’s “approach to sustainable development has evolved,” said Gary Goldberg, chief executive of Newmont Mining Corp., one of the world’s biggest gold-mining companies. “It still needs to be addressed globally, and you still need to come up with a global solution.”

In February, Shell Chief Executive Ben van Beurden told a group of executives decked out in tuxedos and formal gowns at an oil-and-gas conference in London that they could no longer keep a “low profile on the issue” of climate change ahead of United Nations-sponsored talks in Paris this year that could result in new global carbon-emissions limits.

“We have to make sure that our voice is heard by members of government, by civil society and the general public,” he said.

The Vatican is another important constituency. In an unusually explicit mix of the political and pastoral, Pope Francis has said he wants his encyclical about the environment to come out before the Paris climate meeting, so that it can “make a contribution” to deliberations there.

“The minute the word got out that the pope was working on this, we had a lot of people contributing,” said Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana, who heads the Vatican office in charge of drafting the encyclical. “We listened to everybody who had something to say: physicians, academicians, students; people in all walks of life, including people from the oil industry.”

The Exxon briefing took place over a small private lunch at the home of a U.S. diplomat in the U.S. Embassy to the Holy See. A second Exxon lobbyist who is based in Italy attended the meeting, Exxon said.

The meeting also was attended by Curtis McKenzie, a Canadian national with experience in finance and the oil-and-gas industry. Mr. McKenzie has had several duties in Cardinal Turkson’s office, including administrative and research tasks and media relations, all on a voluntary basis. Such arrangements happen occasionally in Vatican offices, some of which serve much like mini-think tanks.

Vatican officials weren’t present, Mr. McKenzie said. He said he isn’t directly involved in work related to the encyclical. A lay member of the Franciscan religious order and a university professor also attended the meeting, but neither has connections to the Vatican, he said.

The encyclical pointedly wasn’t discussed at the meeting, Exxon and Mr. McKenzie said. The Exxon planning official gave a 16-slide PowerPoint presentation covering the company’s broad outlook for the global industry and energy use—a talk Exxon spokesman Alan Jeffers said its executives have delivered hundreds of times this year, including to another group of legislators and government officials, on the same trip to Rome.

Exxon said that interacting with the Vatican isn’t unusual for the company. “Exxon Mobil has a long-standing relationship with the Vatican and our people have had numerous interactions with Vatican officials over the years,” Mr. Jeffers said in an emailed comment.

Exxon and others are increasingly engaged with shareholders voicing concerns about the impact of carbon regulations on the value of their assets. Their argument: If governments rein in carbon emissions, companies may not be able to extract all the oil or metal they claim as reserves.

In response, Exxon published two reports a year ago arguing that governments are unlikely to impose restrictions that will slow economic growth. That virtually assures that fossil fuels will remain valuable, Exxon says.

Rex Tillerson, Exxon’s chairman and chief executive, told thousands of executives and industry officials at a recent industry conference that “everyone agrees” that even three decades from now about 80% of the world’s energy supply will come from fossil fuels.

“We think we’re in a business the world needs,” he said. “What we have to do is deliver in a way that is acceptable to the public.”

—Daniel Gilbert and John W. Miller contributed to this article.

Write to Bill Spindle at [email protected]

In Blogs, Business, Energy, Mining, Oil & Energy, World Tags Alan Jeffers, Ben van Beurden, carbon emissions, Curtis McKenzie, Exxon, Gas, Oil, Oil and Gas, Pope Francis, Rex tillerson, Vatican
Comment

Oil and the Smart Pipe

May 24, 2015 Contributor

By Scott Gurvey The Keystone XL Oil Pipeline has been one of the most controversial of energy issues since it was first commissioned in 2010. The new pipeline, actually the final phase of a four phase project of Calgary based TransCanada Corp., would double existing capacity to move oil extracted from Canadian tar sands in Alberta to refineries in Texas. Critics like Friends of the Earthcomplain the pipeline would “carry one of the world’s dirtiest fuels”. Environmentalists say production of tar sands oil means increased carbon dioxide emissions, water use and chemical contamination when compared to other oil sources and to date the U.S. government has not approved construction.

Pipeline safety is also an issue in the Keystone debate. Even though moving oil through pipelines is generally considered safer than the alternatives of rail or truck transport, the number of pipeline accidents reported each year remains “unacceptable” according to James Stafford, the editor of Oilprice.com. The U.S. Department of Transportation reports more than 62,000 barrels of oil were spilled in 703 incidents in 2014 alone.

Preventing spills has traditionally been a question of frequent, costly inspections. Inspections which have often failed to detect small amounts of corrosion, metal loss or tiny cracks which later result of major breaks. That is changing now in great part because of new technologies being developed for the Internet of Things.

These remote monitoring solutions, often called Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, can provide operators with the ability to detect problems and intervene, taking action before a major fault event occurs.

The latest IoT technologies permit the low cost placement of sensors and other monitoring equipment along the pipeline, capable of transmitting status information in real time.  Stafford says “there seems to be a sea change in the pipeline industry…. Pipeline companies will see dollars saved by using cost-effective monitoring systems to reduce pipeline leaks.”

Enter the Smart Pig

Robotic instruments, known as intelligent or “Smart Pigs” (The original pigs were made from straw wrapped in wire and used for cleaning. They made a squealing noise while traveling through the pipe, sounding to some like a pig squealing, which gave pigs their name) can now be deployed to both clean and inspect the pipeline from the inside, reporting its progress and findings contemporaneously often without stopping the flow of product. The result is more frequent inspections and the ability to dispatch repair crews to a location when needed, rather than tying them up making labor intensive inspections.

The U.S. DoT maintains a fact sheet designed to guide the industry on the use of smart pigs to make in-line inspections of pipeline systems.

The smart pigs collect great volumes of information, and IoT technologies allow oil companies to both retrieve and analyze that data in a timely manner. The Canadian communications company Telus provides oil pipeline monitoring and management services using wireless network connectivity to collect information on pipeline pressures and temperatures and pump station status. These stations are often located in remote locations and physical surroundings where manual “meter reading” is difficult.

Cloud Analytics

Toronto based Fox-Tek offers an alternative, “pig-less” approach, placing a series of sensors on the outside of the pipeline. Fiber optic sensors are also employed to detect bends, strains and stress. These sensors may be able to detect small cracks that the smart pigs miss.      Another innovation harnesses the “cloud” to bring computing power in the form of a data analytics package. The smart pig scans generate such massive amounts of data that it often takes months to analyze. Cloud based analytic software can reduce the massive amounts of raw data to graphs charts and diagrams summarizing what a pipeline operator most needs to know about temperature, pressure, rates of corrosion and even geological events which can effect pipeline safety.

The scaling ability of cloud computing allows the data analysis to proceed rapidly without incurring unacceptable cost. The effect is to use smart software to detect small problems before they grow into big ones.

Enter the Drones

Aerial observations have long been an element of pipeline safety inspections. Helicopters have been equipped with laser spectroscopic systems to detect leaks of both product and methane gas; infrared sensors to detect potential structural failures and to record pictures for visual inspections.

Now the development of intelligent drone vehicles, connected using IoT technologies, promises to provide additional utility for visual pipeline inspection at a lower cost. At the 2014 Intel Developer Forum, the company’s Kevin Williams demonstrated a drone with infrared sensors and gateway communications capability for pipeline monitoring.

The drone not only gathers data from its onboard sensors, it is also capable of operating autonomously when positioned over sectors of the pipeline where network connectivity is not possible. In these circumstances, the drone records the data and continues its inspection. When it reaches a section of the pipeline where connectivity is possible it establishes a connection for transmits the data it has previously acquired.

Transporting oil is always going to be a business requiring considerable care with an emphasis on safety. But the new technologies promise to have a positive impact on both the economics of pipeline operations and their environmental impact as they allow the industry to move from a position of reacting to problems after they arise to one of proactive prediction of impending problems in time to take remedial steps to prevent them from occurring.

Scott Gurvey - For more than 20 years, Scott Gurvey was the New York bureau chief and senior correspondent of the PBS broadcast Nightly Business Report. Gurvey conducted interviews with the CEOs of the world's leading corporations, and wrote a Web column, Public Offerings, for the PBS website.

Send an Email to Scott Gurvey

In Blogs, Business, Energy Tags Smart pipe
Comment

Vortex Wind Turbine without Blades

May 22, 2015 Contributor

By Bill Tucker, contributor at Forbes. Vortex Bladeless is a radical company. It wants to completely change the way we get energy from the wind. Think wind stick instead of a massive tower with blades that capture blowing winds.

Wind stick. Really. Lest you think I’m mad, I’ve included a picture of this bladeless generator that helps with the visualization and explains the company name.

See? There are no blades. What that “stick” (the company prefers, mast) does is capitalize on an effect of the wind which has been a very serious problem for architects and engineers for decades.

When wind hits a structure and flows over its surfaces the flow changes and generates a cyclical pattern of vortices at the tail end of the flow. This is known as the vortex shedding effect which creates something known as vorticity and that is what Vortex Bladeless uses to generate energy. For those who need a explanation that exceeds my ability to fully explain, check out this link from Columbia University on the subject and then come back and join the rest of us who won’t wait for you. (you’re clearly ahead of us anyway) If you are still here with me, the company likes to give a classic example of vorticity that is immediately understandable; the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge that came apart three months after it opened in 1940. This clip posted on YouTube from a film made as the bridge undulated, wavered and ultimately shows the very dramatic effect of vortex shedding. Powerful stuff. Engineers immediately changed the way they designed and built bridges as a result of this incident.

Data Analytics In The Virtual Battlefield

What the engineers at Vortex Bladeless are doing is embracing this effect instead of avoiding the aerodynamic instabilities to capitalize on the oscillation and therefore capture the energy. The mast is designed to oscillate in the wind (which is very different from Blowing in the Wind). As you can see in the picture above, this is not your usual wind turbine. It consists of a fixed mast, a power generator that has no moving parts which come into contact with each other and a semi-rigid fiberglass cylinder. The power generator is a system of magnetic coupling devices which means there are no gears needing lubrication and an overall system needing less maintenance.

Vortex 6m Prototype

According to David Suriol Puigvert, one of the company’s co-founders (there are 3), the costs of a Votex system are dramatically lower than traditional wind turbines. The company publically claims maintenance costs that are 80% below a traditional wind turbine with manufacturing costs that are 53% lower. The lower maintenance & manufacturing costs add up an estimated lower cost per kilowatt.

In addition to the lower carbon footprint of a wind turbine, Vortex claims even further reductions. Because there are no spinning blades, no birds are caught up and sent to their deaths in the name of greener energy. And the lack of blades means something else; much lower noise. Did you know there is a bi-annual conference for the purpose of resolving noise complaints from the large utility-scale turbines? I didn’t. Having driven by large wind farms in the mid-west I can say that I never noticed a problem yet it’s good to know a lot of attention is being given to the issue.

The fly in this very cool ointment is that the technology is a proven concept and is currently is being tested and fine tuned in the field. This means we are about a year away from the reality of Vortex generated electricity. Initially, the co-founders were looking at large generating devices. That remains a longer-term goal but a much shorter range goal is a device of 4kW Vortex that would be about 13 meters tall (40’) and weigh about 220lbs. The company sees this generator being used in conjunction with solar generation for homes that are either off the grid or want to be off the grid. They are also developing a 100W device that will stand about 3 meters (9’) tall weighing about 22lbs. It is named the Vortex Atlantis and the company believes it can be used in off-grid areas to bring power to third world/developing villages where power could be a matter of life and again, used with solar generation. Those devices are forecast to be on the market in roughly a year.A 1MW generator is currently forecast to be about 3 years from market.

Just a quick word about the company before wrapping up. Vortex is a Spanish tech start-up. Its funding, so far, has come from a Repsol Foundation Grant, a loan from the Spanish Government and venture capitalists in Spain (Spanish Angels). In February of this year, Vortex Bladeless relocated to Boston. Here it is working with Harvard University, SunEdison, IDEO and is working with venture capitalists for its next round of Series A funding. Due to public interest in investing in the company, they will launch a crowdfunding campaign on June 1. As always, look before you leap. This is very exciting technology but let your brain guide your investing not your excitement.

In Blogs, Business, Energy, Featured Stories Tags aerodynamic, Alternative Energy, oscillate, power generator, Vortex, Vortex Bladeless, wind power, wind turbine
Comment

5 Awesome Home Automation Products

May 20, 2015 Guest Author

By Tim Smith If you’re anything like me, you live and breathe online, Tweeting your interesting thoughts, Instagramming your dinner, posting photos of your kid on Facebook. We’re living in a world where we have so much more than we’ve ever had right at our fingertips. So controlling your home with smartphone apps and automated systems is a no-brainer —  this technology makes life easier and takes the headache out of many common tasks from vacuuming to flipping on light switches.

Here are five automation products that will cut your energy bills, keep your home secure, and lighten the list of everyday chores:
 
1. INSTEON 2441TH Thermostat
$149.99
 
This device allows you to control the heating and cooling settings remotely, with programming for weekdays, weekends, and individual preferences. If your schedule changes each week, this is a great product for you. The initial costs are more than made up through energy savings throughout the year. 
 
2. Chamberlain CWA2000 Wireless Motion Alert System
Starts at $58 
 
The CWA2000 detects motion in your business, your home, or your yard, and it can be installed for indoor or outdoor use. It has adjustable sensitivity control and can be adapted for up to eight sensors. With a 120 degree wide sensory ability, it detects movement at up to 30 feet. 
 
3. AT&T Video Camera Package
Cost for a single camera is $99.99, with a monthly charge of $9.99, based on a 24-month agreement
 
Are you concerned with home safety while you’re away? This package contains one camera, for outdoor use, and can be programmed to take live video or a snapshot. Additional cameras can be added if desired. This equipment is available through AT&T.
 
4. iRobot Roomba Vacuum Cleaning Robot
Starts at $199
 
The technology for robotic vacuuming continues to improve. The newest Roomba model, the 800 series, uses an AeroForce Performance Cleaning System to pick up 50% more dust, debris, and dirt, with very little maintenance. The newest Roomba sells for $599.99, and the basic iRobot Roomba Model 560 starts at $199.99.
 
5. Belkin WeMo Wireless Light Control Switch
$49
 
You can turn your lights on — or off — from anywhere in the world using your smartphone, iPhone, or iPad. This controller replaces a standard light switch and works through your Wi-Fi system. This is simple enough for most DIYers. 
 
Take advantage of the technology at your fingertips, and save time and money through the use of automated systems. For more home automation ideas check out Modernize.com.
In Blogs, Energy, Featured Stories, Lifestyle Tags home automation, modernize, Tim Smith
Comment

Colorado Oil and Gas Industry Update

April 29, 2015 Guest Author

OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY UPDATE The lower energy price environment is affecting new production and may be dampening broader economic growth in Colorado. Our contention remains that lower energy prices are a net negative to the Colorado economy since the state is a top 10 producer of both oil and gas. The severity of the dampening depends on the duration of the low price environment. Counties with significant industry production and employment will experience the greatest impact, but economies that participate in the supply chain will also be impacted. The energy economy of 2014 and 2015 looks vastly different than even three years ago. A lag is observed between prices and economic activity.

Background

Oil and gas prices recorded a precipitous decline in 2014 that has extended into early spring 2015. As of mid-April, the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) spot price was 49% below the June 20, 2014, peak. Prices are 38% below the five-year average. Price volatility has stabilized compared to three months ago. The WTI has now recorded 10 months of yearover-year declines. Drilling permits and starts are down for the first three months of 2015 year-over-year in Colorado, and the rig count is down more than 40% year-over-year.

Natural gas prices are also off peak from 2014, down 44% in April. The average monthly price topped out at $6.00 per million BTUs in February before falling, to $2.63, in April (as of April 15).

The impact of gasoline prices is readily observable to consumers. Prices topped $3.71 per gallon on August 18, 2014, before falling 48%, to $1.93, in Colorado on January 19, 2015, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Despite prices rebounding 25%, the average in Colorado of $2.41 on April 20, 2015, remains 34% below the same period a year ago, and 30% below the five-year average.

Employment

The Mining and Logging industry lagged the state entering the recession and led the state in its recovery. Employment in the Mining and Logging industry in Colorado is made up of mostly oil and gas workers (~80%). The industry continued to add jobs in 2008, a full eight months after the recession took hold on total employment in Colorado. However, the Mining and Logging industry quickly shed jobs as well, losing one-quarter of total employment in 12 months. As of March 2015, the industry was 18% above 2008 peak employment compared to 6% for total employment in the state.

Historical Perspective

Colorado’s oil and gas industry has changed dramatically over the past 10 years. In 2004, the value of natural gas production eclipsed oil production nearly 7 to 1, and the epicenter of Colorado energy production was in the gas-rich fields of La Plata, Montezuma, and Garfield counties. Garfield and Weld counties jockeyed for the top position in the number of drilling permits each year. The DenverJulesberg Basin quickly rivaled new drilling in the Piceance and San Juan basins. In 2014, oil production in Colorado totaled an estimated 93 million barrels, growing by 28 million barrels from 2013 (which is more than the total production in 2007). Natural gas production in 2014 was 9.2% below the 2011 peak.

During the last major price event in 2009, extraction jobs remained stable and pipeline transportation jobs increased (13%), but drilling (-49%), support activities (-19%), and pipeline construction (-27%) jobs decreased sharply. Industry wages declined by $604 million in a single year. However, employment rebounded strongly and led the state in the employment recovery following the recession.

Price Impact

While lower prices are a boost to the consumer (income effect), the downside risk of these lower prices is that Colorado’s energy economy slows, dragging down some of the strong growth that the state has benefited from postrecession. The energy industry pays above-average wages ($104,626 in 2013) and employs almost 34,000 workers upstream and midstream (30,000 employees, 4,000 sole proprietors). While many of these workers may not be affected by falling prices, the exploration and drilling jobs are among the first to be impacted. Monthly data through March show seasonally adjusted Mining and Logging employment decreasing month-over-month for the last two months, and the pace of growth slowing to 8.9% year-over– year, the slowest pace since February 2014.

Modeling the impact of lower oil and gas prices on the state economy, state GDP grows at a slower rate, but the impact of the lower prices is not recessionary. Total employment grows 1.1 percentage points slower in the state due to the oil price decline in 2015, but employment grows faster in 2016 and 2017 as oil prices rebound above $80 per barrel.

 

Richard Wobbekind Executive Director| Business Research Division [email protected] | 303-492-1147

Brian Lewandowski Associate Director | Business Research Division [email protected] | 303-492-3307

Leeds School of Business University of Colorado Boulder Direct: 303-492-3307 | http://leeds.colorado.edu/brd 420 UCB | Boulder, CO 80309

In Blogs, Business, Energy, Featured Stories, Oil & Energy, State
Comment

Tesla to Announce Battery Systems This Week

April 27, 2015 Keenan Brugh

Tesla Motors is expected to announce a new product later this week: Residential and Commercial Battery Systems. It's clear Tesla is expanding its close partnership with Panasonic, the world's largest manufacturer of Lithium Ion Batteries, through the upcoming Gigafactory plant in Sparks, Nevada. Investors and Tesla advocates immediately speculated that the new product line would be a battery system.

The new product and business model were originally alluded to by founder Elon Musk on his twitter account.

Major new Tesla product line -- not a car -- will be unveiled at our Hawthorne Design Studio on Thurs 8pm, April 30

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 30, 2015

SolarCity just hit a new daily energy record of 5GWh two weeks after reaching 4GWh

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 31, 2015

With all that solar power being generated, it almost feels like something is needed to complete the picture ...

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 31, 2015

While formally being announced on April 30th, Tesla seems to have confirmed this reasoning through a letter to investors. The letter confirmed a "home battery" and a "very large utility scale battery."

There is intriguing business genius with this move. The company is planning on scaling up battery production with the aim to achieve massive economies of scale. Designing a high potential battery product for homes and businesses could help create demand and expand its market position into the electric utility world.

For the customers, it makes economic sense to buy and store electricity at night when the price is low. The system could even sell unneeded electricity back to the grid when prices are high.

Widely implemented, systems like these could help the expansion of renewable energy sources that provide power intermittently when the sun shines or the wind blows.

Around 300 customers have already installed Tesla's batteries in their homes, reports The Guardian. "It’s clean, it’s quiet and it looks good in the garage," investment analyst Trip Chowdhry told the newspaper, adding that the system appeals to customers who want a constant connection to the internet. "If you are a gadget person living a digital life — you have iPhones and computers and you always want to be connected — the storage battery is a dream come true."

In Blogs, Business, Energy, Featured Stories, Science & Technology
Comment

Obama Vetoes Keystone XL Pipeline

February 25, 2015 Contributor

The Keystone XL Pipeline bill would have authorized a 1,179-mile pipeline. The debate is a hot topic for environmentalists and North America's energy industry. The Keystone Pipeline has been under review for the past six years. Just this past Tuesday, Obama promised to veto the approval. ________

TO THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES:

I am returning herewith without my approval S. 1, the "Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act."  Through this bill, the United States Congress attempts to circumvent longstanding and proven processes for determining whether or not building and operating a cross-border pipeline serves the national interest.

The Presidential power to veto legislation is one I take seriously.  But I also take seriously my responsibility to the American people.  And because this act of Congress conflicts with established executive branch procedures and cuts short thorough consideration of issues that could bear on our national interest -- including our security, safety, and environment -- it has earned my veto.

BARACK OBAMA

_______________________________

Related article: KEYSTONE XL PIPELINES BIGGEST OPPONENT IS ITS MISGUIDED PUBLIC PERCEPTION

Journalist Amy Harder and Colleen McCain Nelson explain in detail;

"Mr. Obama vetoed the legislation, not the pipeline itself. The administration retains the ultimate authority over the pipeline, and the veto doesn’t affect the review, which is in its final stage.

The move prompted immediate criticism from Republicans, who have described the TransCanada Corp. project as a jobs and infrastructure measure. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said on the Senate floor Tuesday that the chamber plans to hold a vote to override the veto by next Tuesday, although neither the Senate nor the House appears to have the requisite two-thirds of votes for an override.

MORE IN CAPITAL JOURNAL

Keystone Veto to Test Whether Obama, GOP Can Move Forward Barack Obama Has Issued Fewer Vetoes Than 75% of Presidents Tuesday’s veto was Mr. Obama’s third since he became president in 2009. His other two vetoes were on relatively minor bills: one involving legislation dealing with the notarization of mortgages, and the second rejecting a spending bill for technical reasons.

Many Democrats oppose the project, saying it wouldn’t create many permanent jobs and citing environmental risks that come with pipelines, including spills.

While the rejection of the Keystone legislation was no surprise, it will test whether the White House and Republicans can push forward on some shared interests while undertaking battles on other issues. Mr. Obama has threatened to veto several other Republican bills, among them legislation to alter the Affordable Care Act and to impose new sanctions on Iran.

The Keystone action also comes as a standoff over funding the Department of Homeland Security escalates, with Republicans trying to use the issue as leverage to block the president’s executive actions on immigration.

Republican leaders in Congress and Mr. Obama have pledged in recent weeks to work together on areas such as easing trade deals and overhauling tax laws. But Tuesday’s veto, along with other emerging conflicts, has brought into focus the divisions that could impede efforts for a Democratic president and Republican-controlled Congress to forge deals.

“President Obama has rejected our attempt to work together,” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) said in a statement.

White House officials repeatedly have said that disagreements over one issue shouldn’t become obstacles to agreement on any other issue. The skirmish over Keystone could test that aspiration.

“The question is whether Congress and the administration will be able to pursue a two-track relationship, where they disagree where they must and agree where they can,” said William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former policy adviser to President Bill Clinton.

In a message to Congress, Mr. Obama cited the continuing State Department review as the reason for his veto, saying that the legislation “conflicts with established executive branch procedures and cuts short thorough consideration of issues that could bear on our national interest—including our security, safety and environment.”

Asked if the Obama administration might eventually approve the pipeline after the State Department review is complete, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Tuesday: “That possibility still does exist. This is an ongoing review.” Yet, Mr. Obama has spoken skeptically of the pipeline in recent months.

As proposed, the Keystone XL pipeline would move as many as 830,000 barrels of oil a day, mostly from Canada’s oil sands to Steele City, Neb., where it would connect with existing pipelines to Gulf Coast refineries. As many as 100,000 barrels of that oil could come from North Dakota’s booming oil fields.

If completed, the pipeline system would span 1,700 miles and cross six U.S. states. TransCanada already has spent $3 billion on the project, and the total cost could surpass $10 billion—more than twice an initial estimate—if it is ever built.

On its website Tuesday, TransCanada, based in Calgary, Alberta, said it “remains fully committed” to its project, despite Mr. Obama’s veto."

In Blogs, Business, Canada, Energy, Featured Stories, Oil & Energy, World Tags Canada, Keystone Pipeline, Keystone XL, obama, Oil sands, Pipeline
Comment

Farmers Smell The Returns Investing In Biogas

February 20, 2015 Lorita Kinman-Agarrat

Imagine driving past a ranch or farm and not have one’s olfactory receptors assaulted. Emerging technology in biogas conversion is doing just that by transforming waste produced by cattle and livestock into energy and fertilizer and reducing emissions. Given that cattle and livestock actually produce more emissions than vehicles and our western diet is very animal protein centered, this new industry in biogas conversion is an answer to the dilemma of what to do with excess agricultural waste from both livestock and plant material. The process is called anaerobic digestion (AD), and an enterprising company from the UK called New Generation Biogas (NGB) has developed a new type of AD digester.

Biogas basics

Anaerobic digestion is a biological process where microbes break down biodegradable material to produce biogas, which then can be used as energy to generate electricity, heat and even fuel. NGB has been fine tuning the mechanics in this relatively new field since 2009 which has resulted in an accelerated conversion rate, breaking down organic material in days rather than months. And now NGB has managed to scale down this AD system to be made commercially available for small to medium-sized farms under the brand name Archemax.

As developing countries adopt a more westernized diet, there will be a higher demand for things like dairy and meat, which will mean more livestock producing more emissions. To ease the pocket books of farmers, initial investment would be comparable to the cost of machinery like a combine harvester. Having a system in place that not only helps reduce emissions and odor, but produces a viable energy source as well as fertilizer, will have farmers see a return on their investment within five years. As NGB director Howard Sutton says, “This [Archemax] is about as environmentally friendly as you can get.”

In Business, Energy, Ideas, Science & Technology, World
Comment

Modern Concept Blows In The Wind

February 17, 2015 Lorita Kinman-Agarrat

Imagine living in an apartment building resembling a hybrid of a nautilus and a Dyson table fan. Beyond the aesthetics which looks like it came out of a Star Trek episode, the Dutch Windwheel’s appearance actually serves the function of utilizing wind energy. How appropriate that those resourceful folks in the Land of Windmills would conceptualize this radical design. dutch-windwheel-3dutch-windwheel-4

Striving to obtain complete sustainability, this motionless wind turbine would house 72 apartments within a round steel and glass frame, while also harvesting alternate energy from the sun with the installation of assorted solar PVs, as well as the bio gas produced by the residents’ organic waste. The structure will also be equipped to capture rainwater and recycle tap water.

The concept is destined for Netherlands' port city of Rotterdam, where it is surrounded by wetlands and would have an underground foundation, giving it the illusion of floating. It consists of an inner and outer ring. In addition to containing 72 apartments, 160 hotel rooms, and commercial space within the inner ring, the outer ring has 40 rotating cabins giving visitors spanning views much like the UK’s London Eye. Or one can enjoy dining atop the entire structure in the rooftop restaurant.

DutchWindwheel-diagramDutch-Windwheel-diagram 2

There’s no need to worry about endangering birds either with this motionless, bladeless design. Thanks to the electrostatic wind energy converter (EWICON), the Windwheel “converts wind energy with a framework of steel tubes into electricity without moving mechanical parts.” The result is a structure that is quiet and low maintenance.

The Dutch developers (a collective of Rotterdam-based companies BLOC, DoepelStrijkers, Meysters and NBTC Holland Marketing) will use this structure as a “dynamic showcase for Dutch Clean Technology”. Demonstrating creative innovations, the Windwheel is a quite the update on the traditional windmills of the Nederlands.

In Energy, Innovation, Intelligence, Power Generation, Science & Technology
Comment

Vital for Colorado Chairman: "Don’t Let Anti-Science Extremists Destroy Denver’s Economy"

February 11, 2015 ICOSA MEDIA

This week, the competing campaigns of environmental activists and industry advocates have been heating up surrounding issues of natural gas development.

Activists are pushing for a moratorium on fracking in the city of Denver, even though most of the state's development projects are well outside of Denver's city limits. The area around the Denver International Airport is one of the few areas in the city limits with any active wells leased out to oil and gas companies.

"Don't Frack Denver" activists say they want to stop the threat of expanding fracking within the city where it could affect their quality of life. They launched their effort on Tuesday by delivering a letter to Mayor Hancock and holding a news conference outside the City and County Building.

Industry advocates say this environmental effort is misguided and is essentially equivalent to "declaring war on Denver's economy."

Vital for Colorado, a leading pro-industry business advocacy group, has issued a news release statement in response, referring to the activists as "anti-science extremists."

"Groups that peddle fear, instead of facts, are out to hurt Colorado's economy and out to reduce the tax base that supports our schools, parks and libraries," said Peter Moore, the group's board chairman.

The oil and gas industry has been a boon for Denver’s economy in recent years. The industry makes up about 20 percent of downtown Denver’s office space, or about 4.5 million of the 22.3 million square feet of available space, according to the Denver Business Journal.

A Hancock spokeswoman said he understood the activist coalition's concerns, but she said he wouldn't consider backing any local action until a state oil and gas task force looking at regulatory issues publishes its recommendations. Those are due Feb. 27.

“Mayor Hancock hears their concerns loud and clear and will continue to work toward a shared goal of preserving our environment and quality of life here in Denver. The Mayor is keeping a keen eye on this issue, and eagerly anticipates the recommendations from the Governor’s Oil and Gas Task Force before any action would be considered on a municipal level. Understanding the Task Force is working on a responsible balance, the Mayor asks for the community and stakeholders to remain patient and allow a thoughtful process to take place.”

Councilman Chris Herndon, who represents northeast Denver, echoed Hancock's comments.

A moratorium effort may be lacking an actual legal footing given that recent state court rulings have overturned other cities' fracking bans.

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, involves injecting water, sand and chemicals under high pressure to break up rocks deep underground, thereby releasing oil and gas. The industry says it has been safe for six decades and is subject to intense federal and state regulations that keep it from harming the environment.

Logo

Overall, the oil and gas industry recently contributed $29 billion to Colorado’s economy and helped support more than 100,000 good-paying jobs.

“The oil and gas industry, like any industry, is not perfect, but it operates under some of the most stringent regulations in the country,” Moore said. “It’s been one of the brightest spots in our economy. The facts — and science – are on the side of industry.”

Vital for Colorado is a broad coalition of business and civic leaders formed to support responsible energy development.  More than 35,000 Coloradans, businesses, civic leaders and trade organizations have signed its pro-energy pledge. For more information, go to www.vitalforcolorado.com

In City, Energy, Featured Stories, Industry, Oil & Energy Tags fracking, moratorium, Vital for Colorado
Comment

Factbook: U.S. trend toward sustainable energy continued in 2014

February 7, 2015 Contributor

Posted on Bloomberg New Energy Finance

Prices Fall, Deployment and Investment Rise 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The United States saw continued growth in renewable energy, natural gas and energy efficiency in 2014, according to the third annual Sustainable Energy in America Factbook. The Factbook shows that U.S. deployment of sustainable energy increased as prices continued to fall and that investment in U.S. clean energy grew at a higher rate.

Analysts at Bloomberg New Energy Finance who prepared the Factbook for the Business Council for Sustainable Energy found that “over the 2007–2014 period, U.S. carbon emissions from the energy sector dropped 9%, U.S. natural gas production rose 25% and total U.S. investment in clean energy (renewables and advanced grid, storage and electrified transport technologies) reached $386 billion.”

“The 2015 Factbook clearly shows that America is on the path to a more sustainable energy sector,” said Lisa Jacobson, President of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy. “Our energy productivity is rising along with economic growth, while energy-intensive industries are onshoring production to the United States to take advantage of low energy costs. All of this is happening as investment in clean energy continues to grow and as new natural gas infrastructure continues to come online. These are strong positive signs for America’s economy and environment.”

The full 2015 edition of the Sustainable Energy in America Factbook is available at http://www.bcse.org/sustainableenergyfactbook.html.

Key trends in sustainable energy growth noted in the 2015 Factbook include:

  • The U.S. economy is becoming more energy productive, with “an outright decoupling between electricity growth and economic growth.” Between 1990 and 2007, electricity demand grew at an annual rate of 1.9% while, between 2007 and 2014, annualized electricity demand growth has been zero. Meanwhile, over those past seven years, the U.S. economy has grown by 8%.
  • The U.S. power sector is decarbonizing, with the contribution of renewable energy (including large hydropower projects) to U.S. electricity rising from 8.3% in 2007 to an estimated 12.9% in 2014, and production and consumption of natural gas hitting record highs in 2014. Since 2000, the Factbook shows, 93% of new power capacity built in the United States has come from natural gas and renewable energy.
  • Investment in U.S. clean energy is up again. The U.S. clean energy sector has seen $35–65 billion of investment each year since 2007, a significant increase over the annual investment of $10.3 billion in 2004. Overall U.S. investment in clean energy totaled $51.8 billion in 2014, a 7% increase from 2013 levels. The United States finished the year ranked second globally for new dollars invested in clean energy, behind China.

The Factbook also discusses the collapse of oil prices in 2014. While there is no explicit link between oil (which in the United States is used mostly for transport) and most sustainable energy technologies (which are used mostly in the power sector), the oil price shock has a profound global impact and may result in “second-order” effects that could impact U.S. sustainable energy, the Factbook noted.

“Against the backdrop of a surging economy and crumbling oil prices, major trends around decarbonization and improving energy productivity continued in the United States,” said Michel Di Capua, head of Americas research for Bloomberg New Energy Finance. “Low-carbon energy technologies stand to benefit from key policies proposed in 2014, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) proposed regulation for the power sector and an innovative new vision for the electricity market in New York State.”

The Factbook also shows renewable energy and energy efficiency making significant strides across several metrics in 2014, including:

  • Renewables represent 205 gigawatts (GW) of installed capacity across the country. Wind and solar are the fastest-growing technologies, having more than tripled since 2008. Hydropower remains the largest renewable energy source at 79 GW, with biomass, geothermal and waste-to-energy representing another 17 GW but limited in new build by a lack of long-term policy certainty.
  • Wind and solar reaching grid parity in multiple regions. In 2014, wind developers secured power purchase agreements (PPAs) with utilities below the levelized cost of electricity for fossil-fired power and below the price of wholesale power in the Midwest, Southwest and Texas. Solar providers were also able to offer PPAs or leases to homeowners below the residential retail electricity price, reaching “socket parity,” while utility-scale solar plants in Texas and Utah secured PPAs at some of the lowest prices ever recorded globally ($50–55 per megawatt-hour).
  • The Pacific and New England regions made the greatest strides in energy efficiency. The Southeast and Southwest regions, meanwhile, have the greatest opportunities to increase efficiency. Across the United States, commercial buildings have showed the greatest progress on energy efficiency over the last several years.

While the United States is clearly heading toward more use of sustainable energy, the Factbook did show deviations from the larger trend. These include an increase of coal’s share in U.S. electricity generation from 37% in 2012 to an estimated 39% in 2013 and 2014; an increase in carbon emissions from the U.S. energy sector of around 3% since 2012; and a slowdown in utilities’ and states’ adoption of energy efficiency.

The Factbook notes that policy will play a central role in determining where the U.S. energy mix heads in 2015 and beyond. State, federal and international policies – including the EPA’s Clean Power Plan regulation on existing power plants; the global climate negotiations scheduled in Paris this fall; and federal and state-level support for renewables, efficiency and natural gas development – will all help determine the speed with which the trend toward sustainable energy develops in 2015.

The Factbook also contains extensive analysis, charts and data on a wide range of sustainable energy trends in 2014, including energy storage, oil and transportation, distributed energy, combined heat and power (CHP), carbon capture and storage (CCS), and natural gas infrastructure investment.

For more on the 2015 edition of the Sustainable Energy in America Factbook, get the facts at: http://www.bcse.org/sustainableenergyfactbook.html.

About the Factbook Partners

Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) provides unique analysis, tools and data for decision makers driving change in the energy system. With unrivaled depth and breadth, BNEF helps clients stay on top of developments across the energy spectrum from our comprehensive web-based platform. BNEF has 200 staff based in London, New York, Beijing, Cape Town, Hong Kong, Munich, New Delhi, San Francisco, São Paulo, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Washington D.C. and Zurich.

Business Council for Sustainable Energy (BCSE) is a coalition of companies and trade associations from the energy efficiency, natural gas and renewable energy sectors. The Council membership also includes independent electric power producers, investor-owned utilities, public power, commercial end-users and project developers and service providers for energy and environmental markets. Since 1992, the Council has been a leading industry voice advocating for policies at the state, national and international levels that increase the use of commercially available clean energy technologies, products and services.

The Sustainable Energy in America Factbook was commissioned by the Business Council for Sustainable Energy and supported by the generous contributions of the following BCSE members: American Gas Association, American Wind Energy Association, Covanta Energy, First Solar, Hannon Armstrong, Ingersoll Rand, Johnson Controls, Jupiter Oxygen Corporation, Kingspan Insulated Panels, North American Insulation Manufacturers Association, Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Association, Sempra Energy, Solar Energy Industries Association and Solar Turbines.

 

Posted on Bloomberg New Energy Finance

In Blogs, Business, Energy, Oil & Energy Tags Energy, factbook, oil prices, PPA, solar, Sustainable Productivity, waste, Wind
Comment

Connect & Collaborate - Mining Interests

February 6, 2015 Tammy Schaffer

The mining industry is essential to the Colorado economy, and economies all around the world. In our state alone, mining contributes more than $8 billion each year, and 73,000 related jobs. In Africa, it is estimated the Democratic Republic of Congo holds  $24 trillion in untapped mineral deposits, including ores, cobalt, diamonds, gold and copper. That figure is equal to the combined GDP of the United States and Europe.

These resources and the jobs associated with them, are critical to the world economy, and that's why it matters to the Colorado Business Roundtable. The COBRT is committed to supporting business and organizations that foster the growth of those businesses.

Stuart-Sanderson

The Colorado Mining Association is one such group. Stuart Sanderson, president of CMA, joins us to talk about the upcoming National Mining Conference, held jointly with the SME Annual Conference and Expo, February 15-18th at the Colorado Convention Center.

Sanderson also shares that the mining industry is in a period of transition and consolidation, where some sectors are not as robust as others. The National Mining Conference is essential, to provide forums to build relationships within the mining community.

 

emmanuel weyi picLater, Emmanuel Weyi, president of Groupe Weyi International joins us to discuss his work in Africa. Groupe Weyi supports mining in the Congo, working to ensure fair wages and safe conditions in an area plagued with corruption.

As mentioned above, the Congo is so rich with resources, everyone wants their piece of it, and many resort to unethical practices to get a share. Weyi feels strongly that the best way he can make a difference, is to return to his home land as president. He is currently running unopposed in the 2016 election for the Presidency of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Listen in as we discuss his experience in Africa, in business, and his platform for improving lives in the Congo.

Listen Saturday at 1:00 PM on 710 KNUS –  Please let us know what you think of our program, either by commenting here or on Facebook at Connect & Collaborate with ICOSA or join the discussion on Twitter @ICOSAMagazine.

In Energy, Featured Stories, Mining, Radio/Podcasts
Comment

Wind-powered freighters

January 27, 2015 Contributor

To make ships more eco-efficient, engineers have been working with alternative fuels. A Norwegian engineer is currently pursuing a new approach: With VindskipTM, he has designed a cargo ship that is powered by wind and gas. Software developed by Fraunhofer researchers will ensure an optimum use of the available wind energy at any time.

International shipping is transporting 90 percent of all goods on earth. Running on heavy fuel oil freighters contribute to pollution. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) wants to reduce the environmental impact of ocean liners. One of the measures: Starting from 2020, ships will only be allowed to use fuel containing maximum 0.1 percent sulfur in their fuel in certain areas. However, the higher-quality fuel with less sulfur is more expensive than the heavy fuel oil which is currently used. Shipping companies are thus facing a major challenge in reducing their fuel costs while complying with the emission guidelines.

A new way of reducing fuel consumption, emissions and bunker expenses is being pursued by the Norwegian engineer Terje Lade, managing director of the company Lade AS: With VindskipTM he has designed a type of ship that does not use heavy fuel oil but utilizes wind for propulsion. The highlight: The hull of the freighter serves as a wing sail. On the high seas, VindskipTM will benefit from free-blowing wind making it very energy efficient. For low-wind passages, in order to maneuver the ship on the open sea while also maintaining a constant speed, it is equipped with an environmentally friendly and cost-effective propulsion machinery running on liquefied natural gas (LNG). With the combination of wind and liquefied natural gas as an alternative fuel to heavy fuel oil, the fuel consumption is estimated to be only 60 percent of a reference ship on average. Carbone dioxide emissions are reduced by 80 percent, according to calculations by the Norwegian company.

 
The hull of the cargo ship VindskipTM acts as a large wing sail. © LADE AS

Weather routing module determines the optimal course

For efficient operation, it is critical that the available wind energy is used in the best possible way. In order to calculate the optimal sailing route, researchers from Fraunhofer Center for Maritime Logistics and Services CML, a division of Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics IML, have developed a customized weather routing module for VindskipTM. Considering meteorological data the software for the new ship type uses a navigation algorithm to calculate a route with the optimum angle to the wind for maximum effect of the design. “With our weather routing module the best route can be calculated in order to consume as little fuel as possible. As a result costs are reduced. After all, bunker expenses account for the largest part of the total costs in the shipping industry,” says Laura Walther, researcher at CML in Hamburg. For the complex calculations, the researcher and her team apply numerous parameters, such as aero- and hydrodynamic data as well as weather forecasts from the meteorological services, such as wind speed and wave height.

So how is it possible that the VindskipTM is being pulled forward? “At angles close to headwind the wind generates a force in the ship’s direction. The ship is pulled forward. Since the hull is shaped like a symmetrical air foil, the oblique wind on the opposite side – leeward – has to travel a longer distance. This causes a vacuum that pulls the ship forward,” explains VindskipTM patent-holder Lade. This makes the freighter move at speeds of up to 18 to 19 knots, hence just as fast as conventionally powered ships. Due to its very low fuel consumption, Vindskip™ can utilize liquefied natural gas (LNG) as fuel and still be capable – in the worst case – of 70 days of steaming between bunkering. Thus, it can meet all of today’s and tomorrow’s challenges with regards to fuel economy and emission control.

Wind-tunnel tests completed successfully

The researchers from CML are continually developing the weather routing tool further; the first version has been available since mid-December 2014. By the end of January 2015, the software will be handed over to the company Lade AS. Ship types that are particularly relevant to the VindskipTM-design, for which the weather routing module is developed, are ships like car and truck carriers, big ferries, container ships and LNG carriers. Terje Lade forecasts that the freighter will set sail as soon as 2019. First, the ship model has to pass numerous tests in a marine research model tank – also called a towing tank by experts. Tests in wind tunnels have already been completed successfully.

Source: http://www.fraunhofer.de/en/press/research-news/2015/january/wind-powered-freighters.html

 

In Blogs, Energy, Featured Stories, Oil & Energy, Power Generation, World
Comment

2015 Colorado Business Economic Outlook

December 10, 2014 Keenan Brugh

Business Research Division Leeds School of Business 50th Annual BEOFThis week, Colorado University's Dr. Richard Wobbekind presented the 2015 Colorado Business Economic Outlook. The Colorado Business Economic Outlook is the longest-running sector-level forecast of the Colorado economy. The forecast analyzes the changes in industry sectors during the past year and looks at the events and activities that will shape changes in population and employment, and in the overall economy for the upcoming year.

"Not only is the state's economy solidly in positive territory, but it is ranking in the top five nationally for population growth, employment growth, wage and salary growth and personal income growth,"  says Wobbekind.

Colorado can expect to add 61,300 jobs in 2015. In-migration continues to boost the state's population, while unemployment is falling. The report covers a wide variety, including Agriculture, Natural Resources and Mining, Construction, Manufacturing, Trade, Transportation, and Utilities, Information, Financial Activities, Professional and Business Services, Education and Health Services, Leisure and Hospitality, Government, and International Trade.

"With a skilled workforce, a high-tech, diversified economy, relatively low cost of doing business, global economic access and exceptional quality of life, Colorado is poised for both short- and long-term economic growth," Wobbekind said.

Check out the full report below or by clicking here.

In Business, Energy, Featured Stories, State Tags Business Economic Outlook, Colorado, Leeds
Comment

Oil Rises After Reaching 5-Year Low

December 1, 2014 ICOSA MEDIA

Oil prices rose to reach levels above $72 a barrel, recovering from a five-year low reached last week. After a surprising decision from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to not cut production despite a global excess of supply, investors have been looking for a new price floor. Oil lost more than 12 percent since OPEC's decision last Thursday.

U.S. crude and Brent have also been falling over a wider period of time (five months in a row) marking oil's longest downward streak since 2008.

Brent hit a low of $67.53 a barrel, the lowest since October 2009, before rising to $72.98 a barrel Monday.

According to Reuters, "The market is still very much in panic mode," said Energy Aspects' chief oil analyst Amrita Sen. "Once we get over the panic, Brent prices will probably stabilise at around $65-80 a barrel in the short term."

"We can expect such volatility in the near future given the market had overshot to the downside," Sen said.

The supply growth has been mainly fueled by America's shale oil revolution, though other projects worldwide have also contributed to production growth.  Many of these projects were launched with high-oil prices in mind, so the important shakeout happening will have different impacts depending on producers' operating costs per barrel.

Bloomberg says Russia, the world's largest producer, can no longer rely on the same oil revenues to rescue an economy suffering from European and U.S. sanctions. Iran, also reeling from similar sanctions, will need to reduce subsidies that have partly insulated its growing population. Nigeria, fighting an Islamic insurgency, and Venezuela, crippled by failing political and economic policies, also rank among the biggest losers from the OPEC decision last week to let the force of the market determine what some experts say will be the first free-fall in decades.

Oil has dropped 37 percent this year and, in theory, production can continue to flow until prices fall below the day-to-day costs at existing wells. Stevens said some U.S. shale producers may break even at $40 a barrel or less. The International Energy Agency estimates most drilling in the Bakken formation -- the shale producers that OPEC seeks to drive out of business -- return cash at $42 a barrel.

"Right now we're seeing a price shock coming out of the meeting and it will be a couple of weeks until we see where the price really falls," said Yergin. Officials "have to figure out where the new price range is, and that's the drama that's going to play out in the weeks ahead."

To be sure, not all oil producers are suffering. The International Monetary Fund in October assessed the oil price different governments needed to balance their budgets. At one end were Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, which can break even with oil at about $70 a barrel. At the other extreme: Iran needs $136, and Venezuela and Nigeria $120. Russia can manage at $101 a barrel, the IMF said.

Only time will tell if today's rebound marks the reaching of a new price floor, or if it is merely a temporary stop on the way further down.

For some further reading that some technical traders are reading this week: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-01/oil-price-decline-pictures

 

Oil-price-long-term-trend-120114

In Energy, Featured Stories, Industry, Oil & Energy, World
Comment

Gasoline is Cheap Temporarily, Energy Independence is Forever

November 13, 2014 Jigar Shah

The price of gas is going up. I guarantee it. The price being below $3 per gallon is a temporary “feel good” blip. Ten years of data shows that fuel prices takes dips and always bounce back. If you drive an electric-powered Nissan Leaf, or a Tesla, you probably personally don’t care if gasoline sinks below $3 per gallon. The reason is that you made a fuel choice to break free of oil. Mind you, an electric car is not fuel free. You are increasing your electric bill to charge your car, but it is less than gas. Electricity, by and large, is about $1 a gallon.

Time and again, we declare that we have a goal of energy independence but then we lose the courage to follow through because Saudi Arabia sucks us back in by temporarily reducing the price of gas. But remember, it is just that – temporary.

We are still paying much more for gasoline than in 1999. In fact, transportation is one area where we have not created efficiencies and driven down the consumer cost with choice. Compare transportation to long-distance calling. Today, we expect to make a long distance call for free, or close to free. In 1999, it was reported that AT&T it was cutting its long distance to $5.95 per month for access and 7 cents per minute. A gallon of gas in 1999 was $1.30.

In communications technology, we now have choice with mobile phones, Skype, IP phones, traditional landlines and more. Choice has driven costs down.

With autos, we have very little fuel choice. And fuel choice can actually fuel our economy.

Fuel Choice Technology is 20-Years Old

However, the sad truth is that the technologies necessary to achieve true fuel choice have been around for 20 years, but we seem incapable of deploying them at scale. Six years after the Pickens Plan, our pathway to a natural gas trucking fleet still seems a decade away. How is it that we seem to have lost the ability to actually plan and implement this transition at scale? Figuring out how to achieve this represents the largest wealth creation opportunity of our time.

Generally, these technologies fall into two categories: alternative fuels and efficiency technologies. Alternative fuels make fuel choice possible with flex-fuel technologies. An example today can be seen with the heavy truck-maker Peterbilt. The company is already building about 33 percent of its new trucks equipped to run on natural gas.

For existing trucks, duel-fuel upgrades replace about 55 percent of diesel fuel consumption with lower-cost domestic natural gas. The cost of these upgrades is less than $30,000, generating a payback in about 18 months. More than 280,000 trucks could be retrofitted by 2018—but probably won’t be. Together, both approaches (retrofitting and building new trucks) would save about 14 billion gallons of diesel fuel.

The Government Has To Step In To Drive Fuel Choice

Other alternative fuels can also be scaled up profitably. The reason: we have invested 30 years of research to develop these alternative fuels, and conventional fuels like diesel are still above $3.40 per gallon. Fuel choices like methanol, hydrogen, ethane, electricity, and other renewable fuels are cheaper. However, the Government has not systematically put a plan in place to give American’s access to these fuels at local refueling stations. In fact, the Government regulations in place today make it difficult to add these fuel choices.

Just like with solar and wind energy, getting the existing alternative fuels to scale requires mandates like the U.S. Renewable Fuels Standard. That requires gas stations to have a particular percentage of their fuels be renewable. Today, that standard needs to be updated to an "open fuels standard" to include non-biofuels like electricity, natural gas and hydrogen. Expediting availability of these fuels is not only possible, but also necessary to meet our goals to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil by 2025.

In addition to alternative fuels, vehicle efficiency technologies offer another off-the-oil-ramp towards energy independence. With only one out of every seven gallons of gas being used to move the car forward, it is time to stop waging war in the Middle East and start the war against vehicle inefficiency (more on that later).

Pushing The Extra Mile

Fuel efficiency and enhancement technologies, including improved engine design and aerodynamics for heavy trucks, can push us the extra mile. One exciting fuel enhancement technology is NanoVit. The nano particulate (i.e. very small), amorphous, formless powder interfaces between small moving surfaces to provide protection against extreme pressure, thereby reducing friction, decreasing wear, and increasing the life of components. Combustion engines that use this type of fuel enhancement could save up to 29 percent of the fuel burned.

Another way to make vehicles more efficient is by simply making them lighter. Following the oil-crisis in the 1970’s, average fuel efficiencies more than doubled. However, that increase has been nearly offset now that more people drive heavier cars like SUVs. Carbon fiber and aluminum offer a means of increasing fuel efficiency through a 50 to 70 percent weight reduction compared to existing car materials.

BMW has been a trailblazer in commercializing carbon fiber. In 2013, it built a $100 million manufacturing facility outside of Spokane, WA and is now tripling the plant’s production. BMW aims to make carbon fiber as cheap as aluminum by reducing the price by a factor of ten. Through the use of carbon fiber, BMW’s sleek i3 electric car weighs 20 percent less than the Nissan Leaf allowing it to accelerate from zero to 60 up to four seconds faster than the Leaf.

The technologies to conserve and displace oil save money, yet not enough people are willing to invest upfront to eliminate oil—even if the savings pay off the up-front investment within a few years. It is time to use financial innovation to cost-effectively deploy the technological innovations we already paid to discover.

It's time we had a choice.

Protecting The Right Priorities

Since 1976, we may have had the wrong priorities.

A study at Princeton University estimated that the U.S. spent $6.8 trillion dollars from 1976 to 2007—three percent of its total GDP—defending oil shipments in the Persian Gulf. If the U.S. government hadn’t spent that money defending Middle Eastern seaways and instead invested far less than the average $225 billion per year at home, we would be oil independent.

With a little courage, imagine what we could have done with the $6.8 trillion we spent in the Persian Gulf because of our oil dependence. Now that we have cost-effective alternatives, there is no reason why we have to make that mistake again. When we look back from 2045, we should see a fuel-choice economy that Americans built—not more warships and tankers in the Middle East.

Photo: Mark Weiss/Getty Images Chart: Ten-year USA average gas price: GasBuddy.com

In Energy, Featured Stories, Oil & Energy Tags Energy Independence, gas prices
Comment

Companies Offer Employees Discounted Solar Power for Homes

October 24, 2014 Nathan Meyer

In what is an interesting move, this week 4 major firms, 3M Co., Cisco Systems Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corp. and the National Geographic Society, made available an offer for significantly discounted solar cell installation on employees housing.  Thought up by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the program is known as the Solar Community Initiative and will give employees of the four firms for prices that average 35 percent lower than the national average for solar.  If even just 1% of eligible participants choose to use the program, it could save up to 74,500 metric tons of carbon.  The benefits of the program are both environmental as well as economical.  In addition to lowering the user's energy bills right away, the panels also help make the occupants aware of just how much they've been relying on dirtier forms of energy.  

"People see that climate change is happening right now, and a lot of them are looking to do something" - Keya Chatterjee, senior director of renewable energy at WWF

 

Coordinated by Geostellar, the program is also open to all solar fans, regardless of employment situation, until the end of the year.  Companies, municipalities, schools, clubs and other organizations can establish their own Solar Communities on the Geostellar platform to expand access to affordable solar for employees, residents or members. "We're thrilled to provide our first-of-its kind marketplace that makes the solar experience simple and convenient for the employees and communities of these pioneering companies," said David Levine, CEO of Geostellar. "Homeowners everywhere can simply type in their address and see instantly how much solar can save them on their electric bills and increase the value of their homes with no upfront costs or out-of-pocket payments."

In Business, Energy, Featured Stories, Power Generation
Comment

Mexico is Reforming its Energy Industry

October 20, 2014 Eppie Marquez
Next to the United States and Canada, Mexico is the largest oil-producing country in the Western Hemisphere.  Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto recently enacted energy reforms granting companies access to large, untapped reserves in Mexico - estimated to be greater than 110 billion barrels. This is the first time since 1938 that Mexico's energy sector is inviting increased local competition and opening opportunities in foreign direct investment, ending the 75-year monopoly held by Pemex, the national oil company. Energy industry experts believe Mexico will be bringing in more than $1 trillion in new investments because of this action.

Adding international experience and expertise will boost energy production within the country. While other countries are expressing interest, U.S. firms are seeing opportunity because of close proximity and growing relationships between the two countries.

According to the U.S. Congressional Research Service,

"The United States, Mexico, and Canada have made efforts since 2005 to increase cooperation on economic and security issues through various endeavors, most notably by participating in the North American Leaders Summits. The most recent Summit was hosted by President Enrique Peña Nieto in Mexico on February 19, 2014. The three leaders discussed issues on the economic well-being, safety, and security of North America and issued a joint statement renewing their commitment to regulatory cooperation in key areas or interest."

 

In Energy, Featured Stories, Industry, Mexico, Oil & Energy, World Tags Energy, nafta, reform, trade
Comment

Lockheed Continues Developing Compact Fusion

October 16, 2014 Keenan Brugh

Lockheed Martin is developing a compact fusion reactor (CFR). First announced last year, Lockheed Martin recently reaffirmed that they believe small and scalable fusion systems are both possible and can be practical enough to power interplanetary space travel, commercial shipping vessels, and electrical generating stations for entire cities. They're aiming to have a prototype in five years and a production unit in ten. Fusion, the nuclear process by which the sun operates, is an attractive scientific concept to master. The technology has been "10 years away" since the 50's, though followers have reason to believe this endeavor might be different. Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works has a legendary history of advanced innovation - the [lightbox title="Title" href="http://www.icosa.co/magazine/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/88a28a8877aa538242258691346c017f.jpg"]SR-71 Blackbird[/lightbox] spy-plane instantly comes to mind.

Thomas McGuire, an aeronautical engineer in the Skunk Work’s Revolutionary Technology Programs unit, describes Lockheed Martin's approach:

Aviation Week was given exclusive access to the latest experiment. Read Guy Norris' piece for further information.

In Blogs, Energy, Featured Stories, Industry, Oil & Energy, Science & Technology, World Tags compact fusion, fusion, Lockheed Martin, Nuclear, Skunkworks
Comment

Colorado Gubernatorial Energy Forum

October 14, 2014 Jeff Wasden

LIVE - SENATORIAL AND GUBERNATORIAL ENERGY FORUMOCTOBER 14TH FROM 9:45 am TO 12:30 pm

The candidates will provide their views on the future of the Colorado energy economy, followed by a moderated Q&A session. A panel discussion focusing on the opportunities for Colorado business and jobseekers in the energy industry will also be held.

This forum is sponsored by:

Colorado Business Roundtable Consumer Energy Alliance Colorado Energy Coalition Vital for Colorado Farm Bureau Colorado South Metro Denver Chamber Colorado Motor Carriers Association Grand Junction Area Chamber of Commerce Action 22 - Giving voice to Southern Colorado Metro North Chamber of Commerce AABE - Denver Area Chapter Colorado Women's Chamber of Commerce CACI - Colorado Association of Commerce & Industry Denver South Economic Development Partnership Western Slope Club 20

In Energy, Featured Stories, Industry, Nation, Oil & Energy, Politics, State Tags Debates, Energy, Governor, senate
Comment
Older Posts →