Nevada Wins Tesla Gigafactory

Elon Musk and Telsa Motors have been shopping around the US looking for the ideal location for the Gigafactory - Tesla and Panasonic's massive lithium ion battery manufacturing venture. Congratulations to the state of Nevada for winning the site selection. It's an exciting manufacturing plant (the world's largest lithium ion production facility) during an exciting time in the life of Tesla Motors - The company's stock was just given a $400 target price by market analysts.  Stifel Nicolaus analyst James Albertine compared investors’ enthusiasm for Tesla stock with a “freight train.”

“While there are no fewer than a half-a-dozen other key concerns we share with industry purists, the reality is, these issues simply do not matter with respect to Tesla’s stock,” Albertine wrote in a letter to clients. “Tesla sentiment is like a freight train, in our view, benefiting from a well manicured growth story that has caught the eye of a much broader investor base relative to most auto stocks.”

The stock reached $290 per share yesterday, following upbeat second-quarter results. The electric car maker is on target to achieving an annual rate of production of 100,000 cars by the end of next year, doubling its current rate. More inroads are being made in China which are also contributing to the string of records.

The Gigafactory is an important step in the company's growth path as it prepares to mass-produce a $35,000 model by 2107.  The facility looks like it will reach 50 GWh in annual battery production by 2020, which is enough to power 500,000 of Tesla's cars.  Nevada, while offering a $1.25 billion tax incentive package, will be gaining significant capital investment and around 6,500 jobs. Governor Sandoval said at the announcement that the agreement will add up to $100 billion to Nevada's economy over the next 20 years. Check out the full Gigafactory Press Release below.

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2014

CARSON CITY, NV – Governor Brian Sandoval and Elon Musk, Chairman and CEO of Tesla Motors, announced today that Nevada has been selected as the official site for the Tesla Gigafactory.

“This is great news for Nevada. Tesla will build the world’s largest and most advanced battery factory in Nevada which means nearly one hundred billion dollars in economic impact to the Silver State over the next twenty years. I am grateful that Elon Musk and Tesla saw the promise in Nevada. These 21st century pioneers, fueled with innovation and desire, are emboldened by the promise of Nevada to change the world. Nevada is ready to lead,” stated Governor Brian Sandoval.

“I would like to recognize the leadership of Governor Sandoval and the Nevada Legislature for partnering with Tesla to bring the Gigafactory to the state. The Gigafactory is an important step in advancing the cause of sustainable transportation and will enable the mass production of compelling electric vehicles for decades to come. Together with Panasonic and other partners, we look forward to realizing the full potential of this project,” said Elon Musk, Chairman and CEO of Tesla Motors.

“On behalf of the State of Nevada, I would like to acknowledge this monumental day and provide my initial support. This is a significant opportunity to make a major stride to improve our statewide economy. I look forward to receiving the necessary information so the Legislature can meet and take necessary action to support this major industry coming to Nevada,“ stated Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick.

http://www.teslamotors.com/about/press/releases/nevada-selected-official-site-tesla-battery-gigafactory

Tesla Could Upend Utilities

Morgan Stanley, a major investment bank, thinks the utility industry underestimates the potential of Tesla Motors ability to achieve dramatic reduction in battery storage costs. This breakthrough could potentially convince more people to go off-grid. In their detailed report released in late July, Solar Power & Energy Storage, Morgan Stanley says, "Energy storage, specifically Tesla’s product, could be disruptive in the US and Europe. Given the relatively high cost of the power grid, we think that customers in parts of the US and Europe may seek to avoid utility grid fees by going “off-grid” through a combination of solar power and energy storage. "

“We believe there is not sufficient appreciation of the magnitude of energy storage cost reduction that Tesla has already achieved, nor of the further cost reduction magnitude that Tesla might be able to achieve. once the company has constructed its “Gigafactory”, targeted for completion later in the decade.“

While the costs of the utility networks are fixed and rising, the costs of these new disruptive technologies will continue to fall, and they're falling quicker than the incumbents realize.

Most battery manufacturers, the report notes, have a capacity of around 40MW to 50MW per annum. Tesla is proposing one of 1,000MW – and possibly many more. This, says Morgan Stanley, will slash the capital cost of Tesla’s battery from the current $250/kWh to $150/kWh by 2020, whereas its closest competitor will be at a cost of ~$500/kWh.

Morgan Stanley canvasses three types of approach to the arrival of storage:

On the grid, but net zero grid power usage. Under this approach, a customer’s solar panels produce excess power during the day (which is sold back to the grid), and at night the customer draws power from the grid. This approach could result in low or net zero usage of power produced by large-scale power plants attached to the grid.

On the grid, partial grid power usage. This approach is often taken in Europe, where solar panel systems are not sized to fully allow customers to eliminate their net usage of power from the grid, and where economics and regulation mean moving fully off-grid is very unlikely. It is thus unlikely that such customers pursue a fully off-grid approach.

 Fully off the grid. In this approach, consumers fully depend on their on-site power generation, using storage and a power management system to provide power to the home when needed. Consumers could choose this approach for a number of reasons. For instance, in select markets, customers who choose to “net meter” as in the “on-grid” approach described above, have to pay a large non-bypassable, fixed grid charge; these consumers have an incentive to go fully off the grid.

“By 2028, we estimate Tesla’s 3.9 million units NA car population (or “park”) will have an energy storage capacity of 237 GW (443 GW globally), equal to 22% of today’s US production capacity and nearly 10x larger than the entirety of US grid storage that exists today. These figures exclude any recycled (2nd life) battery after EV use."

"Tesla Model S (85 kWh) can store enough energy to power the average US household for 3.5 days."

Elon Musk Donates To The Nikola Tesla Museum

This week marked inventor Nikola Tesla's 158th birthday. As promised to the Oatmeal, Elon Musk donated $1,000,000 to the Nikola Tesla Museum to be built at the Wardenclyffe lab site.

@Oatmeal I would be happy to help

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 14, 2014

$1 million from Elon Musk! And a supercharging station! Thank you, Mr. Musk!!!

— Tesla Science Center (@teslascience) July 10, 2014

Happy Birthday, Nikola Tesla! And thank you, Elon Musk.

To learn more about the ongoing museum development, visit http://www.teslasciencecenter.org/

Tesla Opens All Patents

In an incredible move, Tesla is making its patents open for anyone to use.  Check out the blog post:

June 12, 2014

All Our Patent Are Belong To You

By Elon Musk, CEO

TAGS: CUSTOMERS / MODEL S /

 39 comments

Yesterday, there was a wall of Tesla patents in the lobby of our Palo Alto headquarters. That is no longer the case. They have been removed, in the spirit of the open source movement, for the advancement of electric vehicle technology.

Tesla Motors was created to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport. If we clear a path to the creation of compelling electric vehicles, but then lay intellectual property landmines behind us to inhibit others, we are acting in a manner contrary to that goal. Tesla will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology.

When I started out with my first company, Zip2, I thought patents were a good thing and worked hard to obtain them. And maybe they were good long ago, but too often these days they serve merely to stifle progress, entrench the positions of giant corporations and enrich those in the legal profession, rather than the actual inventors. After Zip2, when I realized that receiving a patent really just meant that you bought a lottery ticket to a lawsuit, I avoided them whenever possible.

At Tesla, however, we felt compelled to create patents out of concern that the big car companies would copy our technology and then use their massive manufacturing, sales and marketing power to overwhelm Tesla. We couldn’t have been more wrong. The unfortunate reality is the opposite: electric car programs (or programs for any vehicle that doesn’t burn hydrocarbons) at the major manufacturers are small to non-existent, constituting an average of far less than 1% of their total vehicle sales.

At best, the large automakers are producing electric cars with limited range in limited volume. Some produce no zero emission cars at all.

Given that annual new vehicle production is approaching 100 million per year and the global fleet is approximately 2 billion cars, it is impossible for Tesla to build electric cars fast enough to address the carbon crisis. By the same token, it means the market is enormous. Our true competition is not the small trickle of non-Tesla electric cars being produced, but rather the enormous flood of gasoline cars pouring out of the world’s factories every day.

We believe that Tesla, other companies making electric cars, and the world would all benefit from a common, rapidly-evolving technology platform.

Technology leadership is not defined by patents, which history has repeatedly shown to be small protection indeed against a determined competitor, but rather by the ability of a company to attract and motivate the world’s most talented engineers. We believe that applying the open source philosophy to our patents will strengthen rather than diminish Tesla’s position in this regard.